High Intensity Training

Lối Thoát Hiểm

Câu Hỏi 1 of 1

  Thời Gian Còn Lại


0
28571
0
900
block

Match references to methodology/results

Khớp văn bản (nhấp và kéo)   

(0/0)




Khớp văn bản

Zuhl & Kravitz (2012)

Hottenrott et al (2012)

Lee et al (2010)

Weston et al (2014)

Milanovic et al (2015)

Bogdanis et al (1995)

Bogdanis et al (1996)

Rodas et al (2000)

Parra et al (2000)

Burgomaster et al (2005)

Burgomaster et al (2008)

Babraj et al (2009)

Richards et al (2010)

Parolin et al (1999)

Metcalfe et al (2012)

Gillen et al (2014)

Hood et al (2011)

Boyd et al (2013)

Myers et al (2002)

Helgerud et al (2007)

Wisloff et al (2007)

Talanian et al (2007)

Nhấp và kéo

glycogenolysis negligible after 15-20s, exhausted on 3rd bout

HIGH vs LOW intensity, 19 overweight/obese men, LV-HIT (3x/wk) 3wks, LO(70%) vs. HI(100%), both increase CS and COX-IV, VO2peak/submaximal performance increased more in HI

CV fitness is a marker of mortality

Supports Babraj et al (2009)

supports Rodas et al (2000)

Intensity crucial for optimal results

40 active males, LSD(70%), LT(80%), 15/15 (95%/70%), 4x4/3(95%/70%), similar o2 consumption, AIT significantly increased stroke volume & VO2max compared to CET

14 sedentary overweight/obese participants, 3x20s (3x/wk) 6wks, 12% increase in VO2peak, 40% increase in CS post-training, decrease in FPI post-training

HIT improves health meta-analysis

SIT (3x/wk) 2wk, 5 participants, increased enzymatic activity of energetic pathways (CS, HADH), 11% VO2max increase, no control

active recovery shortens recovery time of power output to ~4mins

30s sprints, 6min recovery of power output in parallel with PCr resynthesis

HIT alternative to CET

8 active women, 7 AIT/2wks, increase whole body and skeletal muscle fat oxidation capacity, no control, increased FABP (Talanian et al, 2010)

SIT vs CET, 20 active participants, 3x/wk 6wks, both improve VO2peak, PPO, markers of mitochondrial biogenesis, SIT = 90% less training volume (10min vs. 4.5hrs)

27 heat failure patients, 75 y/o, AIT vs. MICE vs. CON (PA advice), 3x/wk 12wks, AIT increased VO2peak, anaerobic threshold, cardiac function, similar for hypertension (Molmen-Hansen et al, 2011)

Both CET & HIT improve CV fitness

7 sedentary participants, LV-HIT (3x/wk) 2wks, 35% increase muscle oxidative capacity & 35% increase in insulin sensitivity, low subject numbers, similar for T2D (Little et al, 2011)

HiT improves VO2max more than CET meta-analysis

16 healthy, sedentary, active participants, Burgomaster et al (2005) protocol, OGTT responses, Insulin sensitivity improves 23%, efficacy in overweight/obese/T2D? Overly intense?

16 active participants, SIT (3x/wk) 2wk, TTE (80% VO2max), increase CS, 100% improvement TTE (51 vs 26min), control = no training, support for TT (Burgomaster et al, 2006)

29 sedentary participants, RE-HIT (3x/wk) 6wks, insulin sensitivity increases 28%