Jewell "losing the ability to act in accordance with considered judgement or a loss of the normal powers of reasoning"

S54(2) Coroners and Justice Act 2009 - no it doesn't. As in the case of Dawes.

For the LoC to be successful, "a person on D's sex and age, with a normal degree of tolerance and self-restraint and in the circumstances of D, might have reacted in the same or in a similar way."

s54(3) - NO. As in the case of Asmelash.

Considered desire for revenge

S54(1)(b) - must come from a qualifying trigger.

S55(4) "things said or done of an extremely grave nature, giving D a justifiable sense of being wronged"

s55(6)(c) - infidelity exclusion

Hatter and Clinton

V refusing his cup of tea was not something of an extremely grave nature.

s55(3) - "fear of serious violence V against D or another identified person"

D must fear serious violence

Defendant 1 - guilty. Defendant 2- not guilty. (D1 considered desire for revenge, D2 genuinely feared)

YES- s55(5) Bowyer (didn't work).