1. When responding to an Emergency Call (accident w/injuries)  2. Pursuit of an actual or suspected violator of the law  3. Responding to fire and returning from alarm 

1. When responding to an Emergency Call (accident w/injuries)  2. Pursuit of an actual or suspected violator of the law  3. When we want

1. When responding to a call we think needs emergency traffic 2. Pursuit of an actual or suspected violator of the law  3. Responding to fire alarm, but not when returning from alarm 

1. When responding to an Emergency Call (accident w/injuries)  2. Pursuit of an actual or suspected violator of the law  3. Responding to fire alarm, but not when returning from alarm 

No

Possibly we are liable

Yes

  NO Public Duty Doctrine Protection w/vehicle accidents (we are liable) 

No

We can to a point

Can't run emergency w/o lights & siren 

Yes we can

● Power Supply  ● Initiator  ● Expands  ● Switch

● Power Supply  ● Initiator  ● Explosives  ● Switch

● Supply  ● Initiae  ● Explosives  ● Switch

● Power Supply  ● Initiator  ● Explosives  ● Signal

Sound, Gas, and Explosives

Heat, Light, and sound

Sound, Light, and Gas

Heat, Light, and gas

Recognize, Avoid, Isolate, and Notify

Run, Avoid, Isolate, and Notify

Recognize, Avoid, Isolate, and Notice

Recognize, Adapt, Isolate, and Notify

4000

12000

7500

3300

PC and beyond a resonable doubt

PC, RS, Beyond a resonable doubt

MS, PC, RS

MS, RS, PC, Beyond a resonable doubt

Sometimes

No

Yes

With force yes

At checkpoints

Only T.H.P. can at an ID checkpoint

When you arrest them

When you stop them on MS

a)Alabama v White b)State v. Simpson c)State v. Garner The court said there was not enough corroboration due to the officers not following the vehicle to the said location

a)Ohio v White b)State v. Simpson c)State v. Coleman The court said there was not enough corroboration due to the officers not following the vehicle to the said location

a)Mapp v. Ohio b)State v. Simpson c)State v. Coleman The court said there was not enough corroboration due to the officers not following the vehicle to the said location

a)Alabama v White b)State v. Simpson c)State v. Coleman The court said there was not enough corroboration due to the officers not following the vehicle to the said location

As soon as police display authority (blue lights) action of suspect is irrelevant.

Any time the police talk to you

As soon as an officer orders you to stop

Whenever there is police around

When asked to stop

When the person first sees the officer.

When chasing the subject.

When physically restrained or voluntarily complies with police

Never

C- consent I- incident to arrest F- frisk P- plain view I-Inventory E- exigent circumstances

Arrest

Consent only

When we frisk them.

When there is any reason.

The exigency referred back to the time of the stop.

When they are under arrest.