Forming the intent to commit the crime.

Searching for or following the intended victim.

Soliciting an innocent agent to engage in conduct constituting an element of the crime.

Enticing the intended victim to go to the place contemplated for commission of the crime.

The intent to kill.

All of these.

A depraved heart.

The intent to seriously injure.

a recklessness crime.

a specific intent crime.

a strict liability crime.

a general intent crime.

a strict liability crime.

a specific intent crime.

a recklessness crime.

a general intent crime.

Solicitation.

Conspiracy.

Involuntary manslaughter.

Attempt.

Arthur only.

Arthur and Carl.

Carl only.

Arthur, Betty, and Carl.

legal impossibility is a situation where the defendant did everything he intended to do but yet had not committed a crime because the act was not criminal, whereas factual impossibility is that in which the defendant is unable to accomplish what he intends because of some facts unknown to him.

only factual impossibility is inherently unlikely to result or culminate in the commission of a crime.

legal impossibility is a defense to all crimes, but factual impossibility is a defense to specific intent crimes only.

legal impossibility is not a defense to a charge of attempt, but factual impossibility is a defense.

is the same as the usual statement of abandonment employed by jurisdictions.

is narrower than the usual statement that there must be no outside cause.

is that a renunciation is voluntary if motivated only in part by circumstances that increase the probability of detection or apprehension.

requires that a defendant's abandonment occurs under circumstances manifesting a complete and voluntary renunciation of his criminal purpose.

A defendant may be convicted of the attempt even if the completed crime is proved.

The punishment for attempt may never be the same as the punishment for the completed crime.

Some codes establish categories according to the severity of the penalty for the completed crime and specify a range of penalties for attempts to commit crimes within each category.

Modern recodifications of the law of attempt commonly declare the attempt to be a crime one degree below the object crime.

One whose act is merely negligent is a converter for embezzlement purposes.

It requires a serious act of interference with the property owner's right.

The mere act of moving the property, even slightly, is sufficient.

It is significantly different than that which is required for conversion in tort.

The trespassory conversion of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive, and after obtaining possession by means of written or oral lies and/or promises.

A false representation of a material present or past fact that causes the victim to pass title to his property to the wrongdoer who knows his representation to be false and intends thereby to defraud the victim.

The fraudulent misrepresentation of information that leads to the passing of title to another.

The fraudulent conversion of personal property of another by means of false representations.

No state allows false pretenses to apply to real property.

No state allows false pretenses to apply to services.

Under original English Law, property had to be tangible personal property or money.

Under modern law, there must be asportation of property.

One who borrows money intending to pay it back is still guilty of false pretenses if he later intentionally absconds with the money in order not to repay.

One who has the right of possession of an apartment for 3 years is guilty of false pretenses if he subleases the apartment by falsely stating that he has the right of possession for 2 years, and he intended to defraud.

If one states as fact that a stone is high grade gold, believing that it is "fools" gold, he is not guilty of false representations if the stone turns out to be high grade gold.

It must be in writing.

Receiving stolen property, regardless of whether the recipient knows the property is stolen.

Receiving stolen property, knowing the property is stolen, with the intent to deprive the owner of the property.

Receiving stolen property, knowing the property is stolen, with the intent to deprive the owner of the property and to reap financial gain through sale of the property.

Receiving stolen property, knowing the property is stolen.

It is generally the same as the punishment for other theft crimes.

Receiving stolen property is usually punished more harshly than other theft crimes.

There is no set pattern that can be established on how most jurisdictions punish the various theft crimes.

Receiving stolen property is usually punished less harshly than other theft crimes.