s5(2)(a) - D believes the owner would've consented. R v Denton

s5(3) YES. Jaggard v Dickinson

s5(2)(b) - "D believes other property is at risk and is in need of immediate protection and what D did was reasonable in all circumstances". Chamberlain v Lindon

God cannot consent

NO - R v Baker

R v G and R - confirms the use of subjective recklessness in Cunningham

s1(3) - destroy or damage with fire

YES - R v Miller

Yes

s1(2) "a person will be guilty if he, without lawful excuse, destroys or damages any property whether belonging to himself or another and in doing so, has intention or is reckless to endangering the life of another by the damage/ destruction of the property"

The lawful excuses - CANNOT be used

R v Sangha - not required to ACTUALLY endanger the life of another

The damage must cause injury, not the act that caused the damage

s1(1) - Basic CD s1(2) - Aggravated CD s1(3) Basic Arson

S1(1) - "without lawful excuse, D destroys or damages property belonging to another intending or being reckless as to whether such property would be damaged or destroyed"