LA3011: Commercial and Personal Property Law

बाहर जाएं

सवाल 1 of 1

  शेष समय


0
422162
0
600
block

Case and Content

टेक्स्ट से मिलान करें (क्लिक करें और खींचें)   

(0/0)




पाठ से मेल खाते हैं

E v Australian Red Cross

Gross v Hillman

Glegg v Bromley

Norman v FCT

Mills v Stokman

Varley v Whipp

Re Wait

Brooks v Robinson

Robinson v Graves

Aristoc Industries v RA Wenham (Builders)

Australian Provident Assurance v Coroneo

Asfar v Blundell

Barrow Lane Ballard v Phillips

Commission Car Sales (Hastings) v Saul

Foley v Classique Coaches

Charles Rickards v Oppenhaim

Rowland v Divall

Butterworth v Kingsway Motors

Patten v Thomas Motors

Microbeads v Vinhurst

Niblett v Confectioner's Materials

Grant v Australian Knitting Mills

Arcos v Ronaasen

Re Moore & Co

Beale v Taylor

David Jones v Willis

Gedling v Marsh

Priest v Last

Griffiths v Peter Conway

Cammell Laird v Manganese Bronze and Brass

Ashington Piggeries

Baldry v Marshall

Beecham v Francis Howard

Brown v Craiks

Kendall v Willico

Rasell v Cavalier Marketing

Thornett and Fehr v Beers and Sons

Frank v Grosvenor

Heil v Hedges

Thorne v Thomas Borthwick

Henjo Investments v Collins Marrickville

ACCC v Fisher and Paykel

Annand and Thompson v TPC

Ward v Bignell

Underwood v Burgh Castle Brick and Cement

Turley v Bates

Kirkham v Attenborough

Poole v Smith's Car Sales

Carlos Federspiel v Charles Twigg

Eastern Distributors v Goldring

Motor Auctions v Motor Credit

Galbraith and Grant v Block

Maple Flock

Hadley v Baxendale

Charter v Sullivan

Re Vic Mill

Roth v Taysen

क्लिक करें और खींचें

Rule 3 of s 21 only applies where seller has to measure/weigh goods

A condition, once waived, can be revived by notice

Goods must be irrevocably attached to the contract to be 'unconditionally appropriated'

Apparent authority to receive goods at correct address

Breaching party is liable for foreseeable losses

Seller holds title until goods put into deliverable state (s 21 rule 2)

Skin condition not disclosed at purchase led to failure of suit

Perishing (partial loss through theft)

No available market where goods custom or tailor-made

Acceptance of anticipatory breach raises duty to mitigate

Dimensions are included in description

Seller can keep reasonable deposit and profit on resale

Singular purpose in line with buyer's purpose - hot water bottle

Toxic mink food

Breach of s 15(a) if seller had title, but not right to sell in that form

Goods must be fit for all normal purposes for which they may be used (s 54(2) ACL)

Objective test: inconsistent with the truth (s 18)

Bare right to litigate is not assignable, but fruits of the verdict are

Improper packaging is breach of condition and entitles buyer to reject

Writing requirements for an assignment under the PLA

Title will pass when goods are irrevocably attached, not when payment is made

Test of essentiality - fixture or chattel

Pawn shop received title by way of s 21 rule 4

Undercooked pork chop

An injunction for specific performance > damages for installation of fixture

Objective authority for 17(d) inspection proviso

Wood still saleable but at lower price

No breach of s 17(c) if goods still commercially saleable

17(a) fitness for purpose may succeed where 17(c) merchantable quality fails

Cloth still of merchantable quality if can be sold at lower price

Good faith deposit is forfeited if delivery is refused

Strict liability for seller's breach of s 18 ACL

Test of essentiality - medical services

Exception to nemo dat: retrospective feeding of title

Title need not pass for protection under s 17(a)

Goods can describe themselves - car badge

Contract voided by breach of s 15(a) - three parties

Title can never be accepted where goods are stolen (nemo dat)

Personal right to set aside contract for misrepresentation

Implied warranty of quiet possession after purchase

Degree of fixation test for fixtures/chattels

Subjective authority for 17(d) inspection proviso

Breach of s 18 ACL for extended warranty

Price abatement test

No available market where price set by manufacturer rather than market forces

Keeping goods for more than a reasonable time will imply acceptance

Parol evidence rule

Reliance on description of unseen specific goods

Floor plan arrangement for cars

Estopped from arguing nemo dat because of fraudulent representation

Ratio of breach in divisible contract

Dispute resolution clause provides sufficient certainty

Test of essentiality - skill or materials

Perishing (dates immersed in sewage)

Implied reliance is sufficient

Exclusion clause must be wide enough to cover breach